Anyone who refuses to compile an open source project under any circumstances doesn’t really believe in open source: they believe in other people working for them for free.
This entry was posted on Friday, September 26th, 2008 at 11:39 am and is filed under Open Source, Thoughts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
4 Responses to QOTD: on compiling open source projects
OTOH, “anyone who make it difficult to compile an OSS, for instance by refusing to tag versions, in order to get some revenues by selling subscriptions, doesn’t really believe in open source either”
The recording of last week's "behind the scenes of Adobe Experience Manager with SRE guild members" panel is now av… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…1 week ago
RT @iamamoose: If you use Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49 (only that version), you should update to 2.4.50 now due to CVE-2021-41773, a nasty 0-d… 2 weeks ago
OTOH, “anyone who make it difficult to compile an OSS, for instance by refusing to tag versions, in order to get some revenues by selling subscriptions, doesn’t really believe in open source either”
I hear you ;-)
SpringSource’s commitment to open source looks questionable to me, at least after reading this analysis of the commiter affiliations and the notes about Spring 3.0:
http://www.mularien.com/blog/2008/09/19/how-open-source-is-spring-an-analytical-investigation/
Thanks Michael, very interesting!
See also Gianugo’s post at http://boldlyopen.com/2008/09/26/springsource-on-a-slippery-slope/ – the secret SCM tags put the above quote in a very different perspective.